Fanmail for the Common Man
Points well taken, Anonymous (Brian? Avram?) I’ll admit that I’ve been remiss in mentioning both Ruthie and Wilbur. Certain things happened after I recuperated from my last bout of illness, things that influenced my decisions in posting entries on this blog. If there is a problem with my blog, it’s that I started talking about these people and then tried to make my life a bit more private.I thought I’d ask you a question off-blog. I find your blog interesting, but I’m not sure what you’re doing with it. I mean, I’m in on it, but I don’t know that I’m still into it. This is what I see you doing with your blog:
[much unnecessary conjecture, mostly academic, omitted by editor—JS]...the problem with your blog is that there is no narrative coherence. One minute, you’re talking about your wife and child. The next, they’re gone. Same for your neighbor. You get sick, write some wacky stuff, then you pop back onto the blog like nothing happened. And what happened to all that “sentimental traveler” stuff?
You talked in your last blog post about readership. How can you expect people to keep tuning in if they have no idea what to expect, or even what the point is?--Anonymous
You’re right about all of it, though: the disjointed entries, the lack of sentimental moments, the disappearance of Ruthie and Wilbur. I’m sorry you’re not into the blog; in fact, I never asked that anyone be into “The Happy Stevensons.” Like most blogs, this is just a space wherein I can tell others about my life. That is, as you say, the point. I never assumed otherwise.
You, though, demand narrative coherence, and narrative coherence you shall have. I’ve had enough time to sit and mull over the events of the past two weeks. I’m looking forward to giving you the synthesis you so desperately need. Backstory, sub-plots, confessional, mirth and misery: all for you, Anonymous. That’s how far I’m willing to go for someone who takes the time to read my blog.
Oh yes, and free toasters for all three of my other readers.
I’ll even throw in one of my father’s famous Pocket Pan Fryer(R) units.


4 Comments:
At October 21, 2004 8:10 AM,
Monstro said…
First of all, not me. Really, not me. Secondly, lack of narrative coherence? What? I didn't know that blogs were supposed to have narrative coherence. Mine doesn't. No one seems to complain. Of course, no one reads it either. But still. As for being "in on it" but not "into it," again I'm not sure. Does that mean that this is one of the people you've actually invited to see your blog rather than one of the countless numbers whom we bloggers are happy to have happen on our blog. What does it mean "in on it." I assume that I would be "in on it," if theres an "it" to be "on." I'm a little hurt, man.
The commentor is right, though. You're life does lack narrative coherance. Have you tried to foreshadow? Next to balancing my check book, I find foreshadowing to be high up on my list of priorities.
At October 21, 2004 12:12 PM,
Avram Hooknoobie, Grand Muck of All That is Writ said…
Not me either. And I resent my personage being used in any conjunction with the word "coherence." Or wanting coherence.
Coherently contributing to your consistently continental correspondence cohabitating covertly as computer-constructed considerations consists of my careful cessation of any constituent construction of coherent or conversely non-coherent cogitation.
There's too much coherence in the world these days. I prefer the surreal. Make of reality what you will.
As for that free toaster might I request
one like this?
http://pages.tias.com/7345/PictPage/1922270264.html
At October 21, 2004 8:33 PM,
Jason said…
Brian: as far as I know, there is no "it" to be "on." This email had a lot of crazy ideas in it. Believe it or not, you're looking at the most sensible portions
If you're reading this, Anonymous, just know that I don't know PhD-speak, so what appears normal to you looks like strangeness to me. Nothing personal. And I hope that my forthcoming posts will make up for not getting a toaster.
Avram, thank you for your disavowal of the email (brought to you by the letter "C"!) And speaking of surreal, you're only 2 1/2 hours away from a couple of Dalis, some Remedios Varo, some true Magritte, and a bevy of heavy hitters at SF MOMA.
Is it just me, or do I talk too much about SF MOMA?
Maybe it's just that SF MOMA is like a second home to me.
SF MOMA? SF MOMA; SF MOMA!
And in closing, SF MOMA.
At October 23, 2004 7:35 AM,
Amy said…
Someone who does not write books, who thinks a lot, and who lives in unsatisfying society will usually be a good letter-writer.
Friedrich Nietzsche
Post a Comment
<< Home